English Language
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 19 times
In advanced English syntax, transforming sentences between active and passive voice becomes structurally intricate when dealing with ditransitive verbs, complex complementation, and implied agents. Consider the following active sentence:"The board of directors unanimously elected Dr. Aris Thorne chairperson of the international research committee during yesterday's emergency session."Identify the option that correctly provides the passive transformation of this sentence in standard English.
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
To correctly convert a sentence with an object complement into the passive voice, the direct object of the active clause must become the subject of the passive clause. In the given sentence, 'Dr. Aris Thorne' is the direct object, and 'chairperson of the international research committee' is the object complement. When 'Dr. Aris Thorne' becomes the subject, the verb 'elected' (simple past) shifts to 'was elected', and the object complement remains immediately following as a subject complement without requiring extra prepositions like 'as'. For detailed principles on syntactic voice operations, consult the Wikipedia Reference.
अगला प्रश्न →
In a diverse, multilingual English language classroom, educators frequently…
← पिछला प्रश्न
In the evolution of modern language teaching…
Related Questions
→
In the pedagogy of second language acquisition, oral proficiency involves mastering both transactional and interactional functions of language. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding the functions of language in listening and speaking:I. Transactional language focuses primarily on the exchange of goods, services, or specific information, where the primary objective is the efficient and accurate message transmission rather than the maintenance of social relationships.II. Interactional language is predominantly message-oriented and transactional, designed exclusively to convey referential data and propositional content during formal academic lectures.III. According to applied linguistics, speaking performance requires balancing pragmatic competence, discourse management, and turn-taking rules, where interruption cues and backchannel signals (such as 'uh-huh' and 'I see') play an essential role in sustaining spoken interaction.IV. In developing listening comprehension skills, transactional discourse typically demands high interpersonal empathy and emotional bonding, whereas interactional discourse requires rigorous note-taking of objective facts and technical instructions.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical and linguistic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to modern language teaching methodology.
→
In advanced English syntax, prepositional valency and idiomatic particle placement are governed by strict structural constraints. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding phrasal, prepositional, and phrasal-prepositional verbs:I. The phrasal-prepositional verb 'to look forward to' is a three-part construction that is strictly inseparable, requiring both nominal and pronominal objects to follow the final prepositional particle.II. Separable transitive phrasal verbs (such as 'to turn down' or 'to bring about') permit a nominal direct object to occupy either the position between the lexical verb and the particle or the position following the particle, whereas pronominal direct objects are strictly restricted to the intervening position.III. The prepositional verb 'to account for' allows its prepositional complement to be fronted in wh-interrogatives and relative clauses, giving rise to formal pied-piping or informal preposition stranding.IV. Intransitive phrasal verbs (such as 'to break down' or 'to give in') do not accept direct objects, but they can be augmented with prepositional complements to form complex prepositional units.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the syntactic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English grammar.
→
In advanced English syntax, prepositional valency and idiomatic particle combinations often exhibit strict structural constraints and subtle semantic nuances. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding phrasal and prepositional verbs:I. The phrasal verb 'to fall back on' is a three-part phrasal-prepositional verb that is strictly inseparable, meaning a nominal or pronominal object must invariably follow the final prepositional element.II. Separable transitive phrasal verbs (such as 'to look up' or 'to turn down') permit a nominal direct object to occupy either the intervening position between the verb and the particle or the position following the particle, whereas pronominal direct objects must obligatorily occupy the final position after the particle.III. The prepositional verb 'to account for' allows the prepositional complement to be fronted in wh-interrogatives and relative clauses without stranding the preposition at the end of the clause (e.g., 'For what do you account?' is the preferred modern natural realization in everyday spoken discourse).IV. Intransitive phrasal verbs (such as 'to break down' or 'to give in') do not take direct objects, but they can be converted into prepositional or phrasal-prepositional verbs by appending an additional prepositional complement (e.g., 'to break down into categories').Identify the option that correctly evaluates the syntactic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English grammar.
→
In advanced English syntax and idiomatic usage, prepositional valency, particle placement, and phrasal verb classifications are governed by strict structural constraints and semantic parameters. Consider the following four advanced propositions:I. Inseparable phrasal-prepositional verbs (such as *'look forward to'* or *'put up with'*) are three-part constructions where both nominal and pronominal objects must invariably follow the final prepositional element, rendering any attempt to insert an object between the verb and particles ungrammatical.II. Separable transitive phrasal verbs (such as *'bring about'* or *'turn down'*) permit a nominal direct object to occupy either the intervening position between the lexical verb and the particle or the position following the particle, whereas pronominal direct objects are strictly restricted to the final post-particle position.III. The prepositional verb *'account for'* allows the prepositional complement to be fronted in wh-interrogatives and formal relative clauses, a syntactic process that often results in preposition stranding or formal pied-piping depending on the stylistic register.IV. Intransitive phrasal verbs (such as *'break down'* or *'give in'*) do not take direct objects, but they can accept prepositional complements to form complex prepositional verbs (e.g., *'result in'* or *'rely on'*), which function syntactically as unified transitive units.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the syntactic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English grammar.
→
In the context of modern English language teaching pedagogy, the selection, design, and implementation of Teaching Learning Materials (TLMs), textbook evaluation, and remedial teaching require a rigorous synthesis of cognitive theory and diagnostic principles. Consider the following advanced propositions:I. Textbook adaptation frameworks (such as those outlined by McDonough, Shaw, and Tomlinson) emphasize that commercial textbooks should be treated as flexible resource banks—permitting localization, supplementation, and omission—rather than unalterable scripts.II. Remedial teaching is conceptually synonymous with repetitive drill-and-practice of the regular classroom syllabus, operating on the premise that low-achieving students merely need mechanical exposure without prior diagnostic isolation of underlying cognitive gaps.III. Instructional design principles dictate that authentic materials and graded readers employed as TLMs must be mediated through appropriate pedagogical scaffolding to bridge the chasm between native text complexity and learner interlanguage proficiency.IV. Diagnostic testing in remedial programs is fundamentally distinct from summative achievement testing; its primary pedagogical objective is to pinpoint specific learning difficulties, persistent error taxonomies, and conceptual misconceptions to formulate targeted corrective interventions.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to modern language education and applied pedagogy.
→
निम्नलिखित वाक्य में प्रयुक्त 'Phrasal Verb' का सही अर्थ क्या है? वाक्य: 'The negotiations broke down due to a lack of consensus between the two parties.'
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.