BaalVikas
Menu

त्वरित लिंक्स

English Language
8 views

निम्नलिखित वाक्य में 'Subject-Verb Agreement' के नियमों के अनुसार रिक्त स्थान की पूर्ति के लिए सबसे उपयुक्त विकल्प का चयन कीजिए: "Either the teacher or the students ________ present in the class yesterday."

Detailed Explanation

Subject-Verb Agreement के नियमानुसार, जब दो subjects को 'either...or' या 'neither...nor' से जोड़ा जाता है, तो क्रिया (verb) हमेशा अपने निकटतम (nearest) subject के अनुसार प्रयुक्त होती है। यहाँ निकटतम subject 'the students' है, जो कि एक बहुवचन (Plural) संज्ञा है। अतः इसके साथ भूतकाल (Past tense) की बहुवचन क्रिया 'were' का प्रयोग होगा।
Share:

Related Questions

In the evolution of modern language teaching methodology, the transition from structural drills (Audiolingualism) to the Communicative Approach marked a profound pedagogical paradigm shift. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding the principles of language teaching and communicative language teaching (CLT): I. The Communicative Approach prioritizes communicative competence over mere linguistic competence, asserting that learners must acquire not only grammatical accuracy but also sociolinguistic, discourse, and strategic competencies to use the target language appropriately in varied social contexts. II. Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), as a realization of the communicative framework, mandates that classroom activities should be entirely focused on form-focused mechanical manipulation and rote repetition drills before any authentic communicative tasks are introduced to learners. III. According to modern CLT principles, errors are no longer viewed exclusively as undesirable vices to be eradicated through immediate negative reinforcement, but are frequently interpreted as natural developmental signposts indicating active hypothesis-testing of target language rules within an interlanguage continuum. IV. In communicative classrooms, the teacher's role shifts from a traditional authoritative instructor and controller of all verbal exchanges to that of a facilitator, catalyst, and independent participant who manages communicative tasks, negotiates meaning, and fosters cooperative peer interaction. Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical, theoretical, and methodological validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English language teaching pedagogy and Communicative language teaching principles. In advanced English morphosyntax and reported speech transformations, converting complex sentences involving interrogative clauses, subjunctive moods, and temporal adjustments requires meticulous structural alignment. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding direct and indirect speech: I. When transforming an interrogative sentence featuring a wh- word (e.g., 'where', 'why', 'how') into indirect speech, the reporting verb (such as 'inquired' or 'asked') is followed directly by the wh- word, and the subsequent embedded clause must undergo subject-auxiliary inversion to retain the direct question word-order pattern. II. When a direct speech utterance contains an exclamation expressing a wish, benediction, or optative sentiment (e.g., He said, 'May God bless you with prosperity!'), the reporting verb converts into an appropriate performative verb (e.g., 'prayed' or 'wished'), and the optative structure transforms into a declarative complement clause with the modal auxiliary adjusted accordingly (e.g., 'He prayed that God might bless him with prosperity'). III. In indirect speech conversions, if the reporting verb is situated in the simple present or future tense (e.g., 'The diplomat says', 'The lead scientist will declare'), the tense forms and modal auxiliaries within the reported clause undergo standard backshift (e.g., past tense shifting to past perfect) to reflect temporal distance from the speech act. IV. When converting a direct imperative sentence containing a polite request or courteous invitation accompanied by vocatives and tags (e.g., 'Please submit your research thesis by Friday, if possible'), the reporting verb transitions to 'requested', and the imperative verb phrase shifts into an infinitive complement clause (e.g., 'She requested them to submit their research thesis by Friday, if possible'). Identify the option that correctly evaluates the grammatical, syntactic, and semantic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English grammar and Indirect speech principles. In advanced second language (L2) reading pedagogy and cognitive processing models, comprehending written discourse involves complex interactions between lower-level decoding and higher-level schema activation. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding reading skills and methodologies: I. Intensive reading involves learners closely examining a shorter, complex text to extract detailed linguistic meaning, analyze grammatical structures, and decode precise lexical nuances, making it highly effective for linguistic accuracy and vocabulary expansion rather than rapid global comprehension. II. Extensive reading encourages learners to read large quantities of material rapidly and fluently for general pleasure and overall understanding, relying heavily on self-selected texts at or slightly below their current proficiency level, which significantly enhances incidental vocabulary acquisition and reading automaticity. III. Top-down reading models posit that fluent reading is primarily a passive process of visually decoding every individual letter and phoneme sequence sequentially, assembling words into phrases and clauses before accessing semantic memory and background knowledge. IV. Skimming and scanning represent rapid macro-reading strategies: skimming is utilized to quickly ascertain the gist, main idea, or overall thematic structure of a text, whereas scanning involves searching rapidly through a text to locate specific factual details, figures, or key terms without processing the surrounding discourse. Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical, cognitive, and theoretical validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English language teaching methodology and Reading comprehension principles. Analyze the advanced syntactic function, morphological derivation, and contextual classification of the italicized and underlined words in the following complex sentence:"The board of directors deemed the proposal unfeasible, noting that the company's implementation strategy was inherently flawed and that management had acted quite hastily."Identify the option that correctly designates the parts of speech for: (1) unfeasible, (2) implementation, (3) flawed, and (4) hastily in their respective contexts. In the pedagogy of second-language oral communication and receptive-productive skills, mastering the LSRW framework requires an understanding of how cognitive processing and discourse functions operate in listening and speaking. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding listening and speaking skills:I. Bottom-up listening processing relies on the listener starting with the incoming acoustic signals, phonemes, and morphemes, sequentially building up to words, clauses, and sentences to decode meaning, whereas top-down processing involves utilizing prior knowledge, contextual schemata, and expectations to predict and interpret discourse.II. In Brown and Yule's pedagogical classification of spoken language, transactional talk is primarily listener-independent and focuses on the maintenance of social relationships and interpersonal rapport (phatic communion), whereas interactional talk is strictly message-oriented and focuses on the efficient transfer of goods and information.III. Speaking fluency activities that utilize information-gap tasks encourage learners to negotiate meaning and bridge communication breakdowns by sharing unshared data, thereby simulating real-world pragmatic demands and moving beyond mechanical recitation.IV. Shadowing and dictation exercises serve as valuable pedagogical tools for training micro-skills in listening and speaking; shadowing requires simultaneous processing and oral reproduction of running speech, enhancing phonological decoding and prosodic rhythm.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical, theoretical, and linguistic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to second-language acquisition methodology and Language Skills theory.
Log in to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.