त्वरित लिंक्स
English Language
11 views
Read the following complex sentence and identify the segment that contains a grammatical error according to standard English grammar rules. If the sentence is completely error-free, choose option (d).The board of trustees, along with the university president and several senior faculty members, (A) / have announced an ambitious scholarship initiative (B) / that will benefit hundreds of underprivileged students. (C) / No error (D)
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
The error lies in segment (B). When a subject is joined with other nouns or pronouns by phrases such as 'along with', 'together with', 'as well as', or 'in addition to', the verb must agree with the first (grammatical) subject. In this sentence, the head subject is 'The board of trustees', which is singular. Therefore, the plural verb 'have' must be replaced with the singular verb 'has'. This is a fundamental principle of Subject-Verb Agreement in standard English grammar.
Related Questions
→
In advanced English morphosyntax, words can frequently shift their lexical categories (parts of speech) depending on their syntactic environment, inflectional potential, and distributional privileges through processes such as zero-derivation, conversion, or functional shift. Consider the following complex propositions regarding the precise classification and identification of parts of speech in context:I. In the sentence 'The government's relentless push for economic reform has hit a hard roadblock', the word 'hard' functions as a flat adverb modifying the participle-derived adjective phrase, whereas in 'She works hard to achieve excellence', it functions as an attributive adjective modifying the implicit cognitive effort.II. A nominalized adjective (e.g., 'the destitute', 'the brave') loses its gradable adjectival properties (such as taking comparative or superlative inflections directly) and acts as a plural common noun head requiring plural verb agreement in standard English concord.III. In the sentence 'What he needs most is a place to sleep', the word 'what' operates as an interrogative pronoun introducing a direct question, whereas in 'What brilliant strategies the committee proposed', it functions as an exclamatory determiner modifying the plural head noun 'strategies'.IV. The word 'fast' can undergo total category shifting without morphological alteration: in 'He observed a strict religious fast for a week', it is a countable noun; in 'They fast during daylight hours', it is an intransitive verb; and in 'He drives a fast car', it is a qualitative, gradable adjective.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the morphosyntactic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV.
→
In the pedagogy of second-language literacy and reading comprehension, instructional models differentiate between intensive reading, extensive reading, and various cognitive processing strategies. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding reading skills and methodologies:I. Extensive reading typically involves learners reading long texts, novels, or articles for general understanding and pleasure, primarily outside the classroom, which fosters vocabulary acquisition, reading fluency, and positive affective attitudes toward the target language.II. Intensive reading focuses on detailed, analytical study of shorter texts under the direct guidance of a teacher, aiming to unpack complex grammatical structures, idiomatic expressions, and explicit semantic details.III. Skimming is a rapid reading strategy used to locate specific facts, dates, or terms within a text without reading every word, whereas scanning is a macro-reading technique employed to grasp the general gist, main ideas, or overall theme of a passage.IV. In developing reading comprehension, metacognitive awareness—such as monitoring one's own understanding, employing fix-up strategies when comprehension breaks down, and activating prior knowledge (schema theory)—is a critical determinant of advanced reading proficiency.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical, psycholinguistic, and theoretical validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to second-language reading methodology and Reading Comprehension theory.
→
In the historical evolution and theoretical design of second language teaching methodologies, the transition from structural, teacher-centered approaches to learner-centered, functional frameworks marked a paradigm shift in ELT. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding language teaching methods, pedagogical principles, and the Communicative Approach:
I. The Direct Method (also known as the Berlitz method) strictly forbids the use of the learner's native language in the classroom, emphasizing inductive grammar acquisition and direct association between target language forms and objects through oral interaction, ostensive demonstration, and question-answer sequences.
II. The Natural Approach, developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen, asserts that language acquisition proceeds along a predictable natural developmental sequence; consequently, it mandates an immediate, rigorous production phase where beginner learners must engage in complex public speaking drills before any comprehension-based listening phase is initiated.
III. In Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), learners engage in goal-oriented communicative activities where the primary focus is on achieving a non-linguistic outcome, utilizing form-focused instruction reactively to resolve communicative breakdown rather than practicing isolated morphosyntactic paradigms out of context.
IV. Total Physical Response (TPR), created by James Asher, is grounded in the trace theory of memory and developmental psychology, synchronizing language input with bodily motor-action coordination by requiring learners to respond physically to imperative commands before producing spontaneous oral output.
Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical, historical, and theoretical validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English language teaching methodology and Communicative language teaching principles.
→
In advanced English syntax and indirect narration, converting complex interrogative sentences involving embedded wh-clauses and conditional adjuncts requires precise backshift adjustments, complementizer selection, and word order inversion neutralization. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding direct and indirect speech transformations:
I. When converting a direct speech question introduced by an interrogative phrase that immediately precedes a conditional clause (e.g., He asked, "Where will you stay if the conference gets canceled next week?"), the indirect speech must preserve the direct auxiliary-subject inversion within the embedded clause, resulting in: He asked where would I stay if the conference got canceled the following week.
II. In transforming a direct speech polite request or inquiry formulated with modal past forms expressing hypothetical tentativeness (e.g., She said to him, "Could you please review this manuscript when you have time?"), the reporting verb is typically converted to an appropriate lexical item like 'requested' or 'inquired', and the polite interrogative modal 'could' is retained or shifted to a past modal equivalent while the dependent clause loses its interrogative inversion.
III. When a direct speech utterance combines a reporting imperative with a subsequent coordinating reason clause (e.g., The captain ordered, "Do not lower the lifeboats yet, because the storm is shifting southward"), the indirect transformation requires converting the imperative into a negated infinitive complement and applying tense backshift to the reason clause, yielding: The captain ordered them not to lower the lifeboats yet, because the storm was shifting southward.
IV. When reporting an exclamatory sentence that expresses a wish or an optative emotional state (e.g., She exclaimed, "If only I were a skilled linguist!"), the indirect speech structure must convert the optative protasis into a declarative complement clause headed by a reporting verb of wishing or regretting, altering the subjunctive verb form to a past perfect construction: She wished that she had been a skilled linguist.
Identify the option that correctly evaluates the grammatical, syntactic, and semantic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English grammar and Indirect speech principles.
→
Transform the following complex direct speech sentence containing a past-tense reporting verb, a conditional clause, and a dual-purpose interrogative construction into its correct indirect speech counterpart:The senior diplomat remarked to the press corps, "If the bilateral negotiations collapse before the summit convenes tomorrow, how can we prevent an escalation, and will the international community intervene?"
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.